your originating ip address

Thursday

A Few Intricacies of Marketing Online...

For organizations that sell products and services to more than one geographic region, online marketing can create a windfall of revenue. At the same time, there are several ideas that must be considered as part of an overall customer service strategy.
(Sherman, 2019)

CRM Companies ought to maintain information about each and every customer that chooses to interact with the company, limited by budgets. To wit, companies can take advantage of data and patterns from customers, through the tracking of digital customer payments (e.g. credit cards or loyalty programs), buying quantities for given time periods, and returns/complaints -- while respecting company warranties, customer privacy, and ethics. Making customers trackable in a CRM improves a company’s ability to recognize patterns in Attitudinal Loyalty, Behavioral Loyalty, and Satisfaction, which are helpful for reviewing / planning Marketing Strategies.


E-CRM Using customer “emails, websites, chat rooms, forums and other channels to achieve CRM objectives” (Techopedia, 2016) ought to be the norm for all companies’ E-CRM, Social CRM, and Retention/Loyalty systems. The prevalence of online systems, including product/service review websites, social media platforms, and content creation systems allows existing and potential customers to use Word-Of-Mouth more than ever! Customers may interact in an E-CRM style before, during, and after purchases, putting the onus on companies to track the myriad of relevant online systems that may be useful for E-CRM, and perhaps to design their own.


PROBLEMS
COMPLAINTS - According to ‘CRM at the Speed of Light’ (Greenberg, 2009), companies should be worried about bad reviews from verbal terrorists, in that “customer satisfaction scores could be less important to a firm’s success or failure than the number of complaints it gets.”
Greenberg (2009) states that “if a company can resolve a customer’s complaint well, then the customer’s attitude toward the company is improved, possibly even beyond the level of his or her original satisfaction,” which is a good thing for companies that are subject to complaints.

IDENTIFICATION - Companies sometimes are unable to create a holistic customer record, mostly due to the proliferation of multiple ‘accounts/identities’ online. For example, Justin Trudeau may be ‘Justin T' on Facebook, ‘Prime Minister’ on Twitter, and Trudeau@gmail.com on email. The task of linking all accounts to the same person is daunting, flying in the face of good CRM theology and defeating most forms of analytics. Companies may have a Community Manager resolve such conundrums, linking up each identity manually, or design a loyalty program with incentives to encourage people to enable such tracking of themselves.
CUSTOMER GAPS Marketing is usually positive, in that it promotes the benefits bestowed by products/services to customers. Unfortunately, when marketing is too positive, there may be a significant Gap “between customer expectations and customer perceptions,” from the company over-stating the benefits (EPM, 2018). However, if companies promote their products in an understated way, customers can be pleasantly surprised (Gap) by all of the many benefits that are unexpected.
For instance, a few years ago, I was pleasantly surprised (positive Customer Gap) that ‘Bed, Bath, and Beyond’ provided a lifetime return policy. Yay!
Recently, customers were saddened by the removal of their iron clad return policy (which is a negative Customer Gap).  SOLUTIONS As stated in Principles of Marketing (2010), a company’s best practice for achieving the Retention and Loyalty of all customers is to maintain the best possible CRM, E-CRM, and Social CRM possible, “perform[ing] at or beyond customer expectations so fewer complaints will be received in the first place.” All feedback can be collected from Customer Records, E-CRM, and Social CRM interactions, for the purposes of product/service improvements.
Several companies (Cooper, 2018) have been praised as good examples for gaining positive rankings by using CRM tracking, E-CRM, and Social CRM to respond to any less-than-positive communications about their product / service. The following re-framed messaging is paraphrased from Greenburg (2009):

Customer: ‘The chocolate is missing from my chocolate chip cookie?!’
Company: ‘This is extremely rare! You should celebrate your good luck in finding such a rarity!’


SUMMARY Companies need to have a CRM system for tracking customers that are happy with their products/services, and more importantly, customers that are dissatisfied; if complaints are handled well, perhaps with humor, customers may have a higher satisfaction rating of the company. Concordantly, E-CRM and Social CRM are useful for companies to track customers across online media; unfortunately, effective tracking may require a manager dedicated to discerning customers across a myriad of possible usernames and identities. Products / services ought to be promoted in an understated way, such that customers are pleasantly surprised (positive Gap) by how much more value they receive than anticipated.


REFERENCES
EPM. (2018, March). Gap Model of Service Quality. Expert Program Management. Retrieved from https://expertprogrammanagement.com/2018/03/gap-model-service-quality/
Greenberg, P. (2009, December 9). CRM at the Speed of Light, Fourth Edition: Social CRM 2.0 Strategies, Tools, and Techniques for Engaging Your Customers.
Hart, Stefan & Kassem, Gamal. (2012). Social Customer Relationship Management – From Customer To Friend.
Principles of Marketing. (2010). Retrieved from https://open.lib.umn.edu/principlesmarketing/part/chapter-15-price-the-only-revenue-generator/
Sherman. (2019, September 27). [Online Image.] Online Marketing 101: The First Steps to Becoming an Expert. LYFE Marketing. Retrieved from https://www.lyfemarketing.com/blog/online-marketing-101/
Techopedia. (2016, December 28). Electronic Customer Relationship Management (E-CRM). Techopedia. Retrieved from https://www.techopedia.com/definition/30914/electronic-customer-relationship-management-e-crm


thanks from ifranks

Saturday

The Next Amazon is Next Door...


Let's examine the Mission Statements of both Amazon and WalMart, using marketing management ideas - specifically insights on strategies, goals, technology, sourcing, and orientation.

Amazon is Market-Oriented
The world’s fourth largest marketing platform is currently Amazon.com (Markman, 2017). Their Mission Statement is
“To be Earth’s most customer-centric company, where customers can find and discover anything they might want to buy online, and endeavors to offer its customers the lowest possible prices,”
which clearly outlines their valuable purpose for customers and a forward-looking strategy to achieve a goal of low pricing.
Amazon is likely market-oriented, rather than product-, production-, or futuristically oriented.  Product-orientation implies that Amazon mainly creates products itself, which it does not (Business Case Studies, 2019).  Mainly, Amazon offers a multitude of products for sale, sourced through a multitude of vendors; there are a relatively small quantity of products made by Amazon itself (Amazon Branded), sold as substitutes for other vendors’ products, when their inventories are empty, fake, or problematic (Edelman, 2019).
Amazon Branded products are usually at a higher price than other vendors that sell through Amazon, so Amazon is unlikely to be production-oriented (Quain, 2018).  Likewise, despite the inclusion of the forward-looking words “...endeavors to offer…” in their Mission Statement, Amazon’s mission statement is not futuristic, since it accurately describes Amazon today.As implied in Amazon’s Mission Statement, Amazon is strongly market-oriented to “...be Earth’s most customer-centric company...discover anything they might want [at] the lowest possible prices.” Amazon organizes its activities, products, and services around its customers wants and needs (Business Case Studies, 2019), with over 600 million products (Johnson, 2018).



Opinion: Update the Real Canadian Superstore and WalMart’s Mission Statement to Compete with Amazon
WalMart’s Mission Statement has been reviewed and updated over the years; previously, it was “We deliver low prices, every day;”  currently, WalMart’s Mission Statement is “to save people money so they can live better.” Because of internal and external factors relevant to marketing, NOW may be the best time to review and update the Mission Statement for both the Real Canadian Superstore and WalMart, based on consumer experiences.

From our shopping experiences, most people buy almost exactly the same products from a local retail location, every week.  Neither the Real Canadian Superstore nor WalMart have done much capitalize on consumer shopping habits, other than keeping it’s doors open late into the night.


A more 'pushy' approach could incentivize and promote regular online shopping habits!

Both the Real Canadian Superstore and WalMart have sufficient internal qualities to rival that of Amazon, such that these retailers can take advantage of external qualities, given today’s popularity of one-to-one marketing.  WalMart’s goal of “saving money” is a good one, but needs to be updated similar to what they had used previously as a Mission Statement. Perhaps something along the lines of
“We deliver what you need to live better, every day at low prices!”

Mostly Strengths and Few Weaknesses
Internally, both the Real Canadian Superstore and WalMart already have the technology and processes to surpass Amazon: 
online ordering, telephone ordering, delivery to homes, and pick-up from any of their local retail locations; if consumers can't wait for a scheduled delivery, they can simply walk-in and buy from any of their locations.  

WalMart ought to utilize their advantage of the worldwide ‘big data’ that they have, and push buying recommendations to consumers, so that we can have our usual purchases delivered regularly; likewise, the Real Canadian Superstore can do the same, within Canada. 
They can both offer supplemental products that consumers might not know they wanted, but do want... like Amazon does (Wills, 2018).  Though the Real Canadian Superstore and WalMart have lower profit margins than other vendors, this can be overcome by increasing sales volume through 'recommendations' mitigated by their 'big data.'

Opportunities and Threats
With the popularity of home delivery services, retailers can capitalize on a few aspects: products can be marketed and delivered to remote locations; more hiring can be done to expedite analytics and deliveries; and overall product quality can improve by more accurately eliminating under-performing products, while pushing recommended products (Smithson, 2019).
Unfortunately, because consumers and retailers have already realized that the next Amazon may be 'around the corner,' other retailers have started heavy competitions in the retail/big data/delivery space, according to Investopedia (Segal, 2020).

Summary
Both the Real Canadian Superstore and WalMart need to proactively push regular home deliveries / pick-up of products that consumers buy habitually, capitalizing on it's 'big data' to “deliver what we need to live better, every week, at low prices,” as soon as possible to win against Amazon.  Updating its Mission Statement would be a first step to increase its sales volume, profitability, and regularly satisfy its loyal base of customers.

















References
Markman, J. (2017). The Amazon Era: No Profits, No Problem. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonmarkman/2017/05/23/the-amazon-era-no-profits-no-problem/#251a7eed437a 
Business Case Studies, (2019). Market-and-product-orientation. Retrieved from https://businesscasestudies.co.u/market-and-product-orientation/
Edelman, G. (2019). Amazon Doesn’t Favor Its Own Brands—Except When It Does. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-gating-private-labels-antitrust/
Segal, T. (2020). Who Are Amazon's (AMZN) Main Competitors? Company Profiles. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/120314/who-are-amazons-amzn-main-competitors.asp
Smithson, N. (2019). Walmart SWOT Analysis & Recommendations. Panmore Institute. Retrieved from http://panmore.com/walmart-swot-analysis-recommendations-case-study
Wills, J. (2018). 7 Ways Amazon Uses Big Data to Stalk You (AMZN). Cybersecurity. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/articles/insights/090716/7-ways-amazon-uses-big-data-stalk-you-amzn.asp
Quain, S. (2018). Difference Between Product Orientation and Production Orientation. Houston Chronicle. Retrieved from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/difference-between-product-orientation-production-orientation-16004.html



thanks from ifranks

More...